This is what really happened: The company was about to close its doors because it spent everything and needed more money to keep operating.
Here's what else happened and things to think about for your next startup (because if your taking venture money -- you're on life support...):
1. Dilution and failure cascade
A venture round is the beginning of a failure cascade. Any company that accepts or takes venture money effectively announced they went out of business and were rescued for 10 cents on the dollar. Most venture funding rounds are bets that the asset breakup value of the company are greater than the funding required. If you work at the company and own 10% of it, you would now, typically, own 1%. This isn't the VC's being unfair -- this is that the company spent all its money and rather than ceasing operations (and your stock going to 0%) a VC put in money to keep it operating.
Regardless, the morale hit for working at a company like this is nail-in-coffin #1. Though, frankly, it was doomed if it's gotten this far. The VC probably believes they can flip it (sell it) to a bigger company for 10 times return on investment. Either way, if you work there -- you'll be out of a job shortly...
2. The company over-spent
Rather than fixing the 'problem' (too high a burn rate also know as 'expenses') the company continues to operate and pay exorbitant salaries based on massive growth numbers. When they take the VC money, they will be forced to adjust. Why they didn't do that in the first place --that's covered in the bad planning bullet. But, expect layoffs or cutbacks or restructuring or whatever you might want to call it. It's coming...
3. Bad planning
This is really part of my '
how to not get screwed by VC's' -- but, when you take round 1 -- VC's know you'll be back for round 2. It's a given. There is no way to grow at the rate you predict and so you'll need more money. The difference is: In round 1 -- you were doing better and had a nice, profitable, growing company. In round 2 -- you'll be desperate because you expanded operations faster than you grew. You HAD to because it's what your business plan said to get round 1 financing. And, it's also in your performance contract to produce a certain growth rate. Essentially, it forces bad planning.
This is where the VC's will have a major upper hand in deciding on and negotiating additional funding. Round 1 from VC's = good. Round 2 = not good. Whatever you do -- don't ever get round 2...
In summary... If you see a company taking round 2 (or more) of financing / venture funding -- it means they are up for sale. They expect a bigger company to gobble them up within 12 months (or, an IPO) and their best talent is probably available for hire... Is 2nd round funding a sure sign of failure? I can't think of any case where it is not. Because if they were succeeding, 1) Their management would fight the equity loss by leveraging growth through debt (vs. equity), and 2) their previous investors would never let a dilution occur if the company was that valuable.